If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.
Why THAT surprise cameo in House of the Dragon's season 2 finale makes sense, according to the showrunner
A little light prophesy never hurt anyone.
Popverse's top stories of the day
- How the Star Trek V: The Final Frontier campfire scene encapsulated and inspired everything we love about the Marvel Studios movies & TV shows
- WATCH: Yellowstone: John Dutton's fate, Kevin Costner's exit, and season 5's biggest surprise revealed
- Creature Commandos at NYCC '24: The weirdest, wildest & Weasel-est moments from DC & Max's James Gunn-led panel
With House of the Dragon taking place over 150 years before Game of Thrones, the creators have a tough job of making the prequel has had a tough job making it feel connected to the original show. Characters don’t live that long in the setting and the landscape of Westeros changes massively after Robert’s Rebellion, so the writers had to lean on the power of prophesy in one moment from the House of the Dragon season two finale to tie the two shows together.
That is the reasoning behind Daenerys' surprise cameo in the House of the Dragon season two finale. Matt Smith’s Daemon Targaryen sees Daenerys in a vision of the future, though the meaning behind it seems to be lost on Daemon. Showrunner Ryan Condal, speaking to a group of journalists in a virtual press conference following the end of the second season, explained why the future Mother of Dragon's appearance (this time played by Imogen Ruby Little) was shoehorned into the finale.
“House of the Dragon is a prequel to a famous story, one of the biggest, if not the biggest television story of all time,” he said. “There needs to be some interconnectivity. And because so many years have passed, there are really no characters that would be alive from our time period that exist in subsequent series. So we were always looking for this interconnectivity between the two.”
Of course, there is another Targaryen in Game of Thrones that they could have used – Jon Snow. However, that wouldn’t have had the same thematic impact. “Remember that Game of Thrones, A Song of Ice and Fire, House of the Dragon in many ways are warnings about the perils of power and people in power and absolute power,” Condal explained. Power, in House Targaryen, means dragons, and, in Game of Thrones, that means Daenerys. “The connectivity for us is specifically in and around dragons… We know who Daenerys is watching that image, but Daemon has no idea.”
We as viewers know what is coming at the end of House of the Dragon, of course – a world without dragons at all. They don’t reappear in the world for dozens of years when Daenerys steps out of the fire with her three “sons” at the end of season one of Game of Thrones. So, with that in mind, it does make sense that the producers would use her as the connective tissue between the two time periods – even if that idea wasn’t immediately clear to fans when they first saw it.
Want to know what's coming up next in pop culture? Check out Popverse's guides to:
And if you're looking for specific franchises or genres, we've also got lists for the:
Finally, if you're a fan of superheroes and not specific to just Marvel or DC, we have overall guides to:
Follow Popverse for upcoming event coverage and news
Find out how we conduct our review by reading our review policy
Let Popverse be your tour guide through the wilderness of pop culture
Sign in and let us help you find your new favorite thing.
Comments
Want to join the discussion? Please activate your account first.
Visit Reedpop ID if you need to resend the confirmation email.